Istifta 14817 — Rules of Slaughtering
Would prevention by law, of slaughtering at Mina be sufficient to realise the inability to carry out slaughtering there, especially, if there was reason to believe that a financial or physical harm could ensue, should the law be broken?
Answer
Fear of consequential harm for breaking the law should lift the obligation of slaughtering at Mina. It must not be understood, though, that slaughtering elsewhere would make up for slaughtering in it. However, what makes slaughtering elsewhere in order is [indeed] Mina’s small capacity to host all pilgrims as discussed in Manisikul Hajj. Apparently, slaughtering was made impossible, for the reasons mentioned in the question, not for the smallness of Mina? Therefor, combining both slaughtering outside Mina and fasting in lieu of hady (sacrificial offering) should be in order, as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi.
#slaughtering_in_wadi_muhassar_if_crowded#fasting_in_lieu_of_hady_when_slaughter_prevented_by_law#ذبح_در_وادی_محسر_در_صورت_ازدحام#روزه_بدل_از_قربانی_هنگام_ممنوعیت_قانونی_ذبح